Politics without a political slant - marublog

25 responses so far ↓

• 1 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  Prove it

• 2 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  This argument is also pretty relevant to the convergence between the Conservative and Labour parties in Britain.

• 3 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  anti-american communistic propagandism

• 4 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  0:50 “It’s your own choice: Do you want to live in a democratic society - or do you want to live in the society we have?”

  well said

• 5 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  people are influenced in their behavour by the nations. They see: “Aha!, the nation uses exessive power to get what it wants”, so in in a way how nations act justifies the use
  of agression by individuals in the nation.

  like if a father uses force and dominance in a family and the world , this has grave effects on how the children precieve the world in their lives.

• 6 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  The Chomsky vs Foucault debate is one of the most interesting discussions ever captured by a video camera - watch it if you haven’t already

• 7 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  omg wat is this guy talking abuot??!!??!! seriusly YAWN lolz Jonas Brothers for President!!!!

• 8 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  You are only half right JEG2001. America SHOULD be about being free and finding your own sense of justice in life. The current oppresive system does not allow people to do that freely. Also, if people were to “find their own sense of justice, social justice would inevitably follow. It would have to by definition.

• 9 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  JEG2001; you said “America is about being free and finding your own sense of justice in life. Those that look for social justice are seeking fools gold.” What you apparently fail to realize is that whenone HONESTLY finds their own sense of justice, social justice ineveitably follows.

• 10 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  He seems to make sense out of nonsense spouted everywhere. Everything he says makes sense to me

• 11 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  If you want to understand America read John Locke “Liberalism” Read this book and you will understand the theories that make America way it is. Chomsky is twisting Madison ideas and not telling people everything Madison and the founding father believe. America is about being free and finding your own sense of justice in life. Those that look for social justice are seeking fools gold.

• 12 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  I am not an anarchist, but I respect Noam Chomsky’s ethical system.

  I reject the intelligence community’s argument that “to make an omelet you have to break some eggs.”

  Three conditions must be met for an action to be good:
  1. Motivation for action must be good,
  2. Means must be good (no bad deeds for a “good cause”), and
  3. the desired result must be good.

  American foreign policy has been for motivated by greed & more power. America has supported dictatorships and overthrown democracies.

• 13 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  “Every government is corrupt and every nation has done terrible things.”

  Depressingly true. As Tennessee Williams once put it, “If people behaved in the way nations do they would all be put in straitjackets.” Yet we continue to refrain from taking the necessary radical action to rectify this.

• 14 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  Every government is corrupt and every nation has done terrible things. Very few have done the good things America has done. Chomsky is an idealist and a self-described anarachist-communist…completely unrealistic…the guy is definitely intelligent but does not understand that Utopia is impossible because people will always want to hold power over others. He paints a positive picture of the USSR (1 of the worst governments ever)in some speeches but never mentions anything good about the US.

• 15 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  Sound low but much said plus plenty more here of Noam Chomsky a genuine researcher for democracy and although compromised by what our authorizes tolerate

• 16 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  Someone wearing a communist t-shirt is a traitor? How? Could you entertain us with what is going on in your chicken brain?

• 17 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  You sir are wrong… u havent looked anything up u still call communism the far left… listen it is for sure the far right u obviously have not done any real research what so ever… communism is the least amount of gov’t control b4 anarchy… making it far right… the extreme left is complete facism and the extreme right is communism… and b4 u spout off what u think u know about communism there has never been a real communist country b4 so no sense in really talking about it

• 18 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  kakada007
  will want lil boys
  when he goes to heaven

• 19 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  Ohhh wait just a minute now i see the resembalence, check u-tubes amsterdams zoo sex hi mom hi dad

• 20 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  Let me get this right,accordimg to your last statement”but i am not a brainwashed confused as you” I think you should get the books , elementry books that is, learn to get your thoughts togeather before you make yourself look stupid again comrade

• 21 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  well said.

• 22 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  pubsterguy (6 days ago) Show Hide -5 Marked as spam Reply | Spam robert dahl is an idiot, and? so is noam.thats what you have writen?read your comment again.you are a very confused man.could you please buy some books and educate your self.and no i am not a che guevara shirt wearing communist but i am not a brain washed confused like you.

• 23 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  I said Robert Dahl was an idiot,not Chomsky ,get it right, I tried to be civil with you but it turns out that your probably a che guevara t- shirt wearing communist there fore a traitor ,if and when the shit comes down people will remember who was with us and who was against us

• 24 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  Calling the still very active Chomsky an idiot (nstitute Professor emeritus of linguistics at MIT, father of modern linguistics, and considered a walking foreign policy treasure trove of information) an idiot, makes you look like the preeminent KING of idiots. Buckley was an arrogant ass when compared to Chomsky. His goal was the same as Rush Limbaugh’s, feed your audience what it wants for ratings. Nothing more.

  No, Buckley was the idiot, and this video shows it quite well.

• 25 Anonymous // Aug 16, 2008 at 1:35 am

  DKfor08 I’m sorry but socialism IS on the left . and communism is never on the right it is always on the exteame left , please check it out

Leave a Comment