We know that all the 3rd party Candidates out there are fully superior choices to the Obama Mccain chaos.
Thats all we need to know, the choice is quite easy to understand , whatever you do
Make sure you encourage every Voter to simply vote the 3rd party candidate they like ! Do NOT reward Mccain or Obama with your vote, they’ve done Nothing to deserve it, both men will change nothing
Ron Paul is having a convention at the same time as the Republican Convention. Though I doubt this will happen, it would be interesting if Paul indorsed the Libertarian Party because he has stated he will not run as an independent. That would unify the Libertarian movement and Barr could receive as much as 15% or more of the vote. Also, Paul’s donations might be better spent with a candidate that is on the ballot. It all depends on what Paul decides to do.
Sen. Barr because Dr. Paul isn’t interested in the presidency anymore. Besides Paul never said anything ill about Barr. There is no such thing as the perfect candidate.
Granted, he did ramble on a bit (apparently he has something to sell), but he only spoke approximately 8 and a half minutes throughout the entire 49 minute piece (I didn’t count the last part since it wasn’t part of the “debate”).
More like 15% rather than 60%, but still more than the usual moderator.
Are you kidding me? A moderator is supposed to set the tone for the panel, not spend 60% of the time speaking himself. He’s less a moderator and more a glorified panelist, with the exception that no one cares what he thinks as we’re here for the panel.
No one is asking to be “entertained”. We’re asking that the moderator shut the hell up and let the panelists share their perspective.
The stupid moderator talked too damn much, and they ran out of time before anyone else could address the last question about the Line Item Veto…
I thought for SURE that Bob Barr would come out with guns blazing on that one as a distortion of the Contitutional balance of power toward the Executive.
we need to concentrate on individual states and elect positions from the bottom up:
city council
state legislature
state senate
governor
Once we have several small states under our belt then we can expand our base. It has to be a concentrated effort.
i was naked while I watched this video! P
g uhh wow this video has 2 be one of the Silliest and sexiest vids online. just like me! l
Right On the money Video!
BARR PAUL 08
So true
We know that all the 3rd party Candidates out there are fully superior choices to the Obama Mccain chaos.
Thats all we need to know, the choice is quite easy to understand , whatever you do
Make sure you encourage every Voter to simply vote the 3rd party candidate they like ! Do NOT reward Mccain or Obama with your vote, they’ve done Nothing to deserve it, both men will change nothing
REAL CONSERVATIVES refuse to vote for John McCain!
REAL CONSERVATIVES are voting for Bob Barr (ultra-conservative from Georgia) for President !!!
Bob Barr will be on the ballot in 50 states.
Ron Paul is having a convention at the same time as the Republican Convention. Though I doubt this will happen, it would be interesting if Paul indorsed the Libertarian Party because he has stated he will not run as an independent. That would unify the Libertarian movement and Barr could receive as much as 15% or more of the vote. Also, Paul’s donations might be better spent with a candidate that is on the ballot. It all depends on what Paul decides to do.
Either way…
FREEDOM ‘08
Sen. Barr because Dr. Paul isn’t interested in the presidency anymore. Besides Paul never said anything ill about Barr. There is no such thing as the perfect candidate.
I’d vote Barr because it will push the Libertarian Party up into the limelight a little more.
I can’t decide whether to vote Bob Barr, or write in Ron Paul.
Will it really matter either way?
I fucking hate when he calls those dates,”Twenty-o-four”- Just stfu.
Ron Paul or Bob Barr !!!!!!!!
Granted, he did ramble on a bit (apparently he has something to sell), but he only spoke approximately 8 and a half minutes throughout the entire 49 minute piece (I didn’t count the last part since it wasn’t part of the “debate”).
More like 15% rather than 60%, but still more than the usual moderator.
Are you kidding me? A moderator is supposed to set the tone for the panel, not spend 60% of the time speaking himself. He’s less a moderator and more a glorified panelist, with the exception that no one cares what he thinks as we’re here for the panel.
No one is asking to be “entertained”. We’re asking that the moderator shut the hell up and let the panelists share their perspective.
The Nat’l debate really should be between Barr & Barack.
McCain, I can’t help but believe, will come across as an old forgetful coot. (Of course FAUX will excuse anything McCain says or does).
ron paul is an idea
hey bob be a ross perot and screw this country with your worthless run for president
That’s yet another problem with America. We want to be entertained rather than listen to the message.
If it doesn’t come in a pretty package, we don’t want it.
Disappointing.
Wow… this dude is quite possibly the worst moderator I have ever seen.
can you send me them please!!!
no speaker number 1, Ronald regan did not invent conservatism.
… and you think that will work?
We begged, screamed, waved signs and even chased them down with snowballs. Nothing worked.
They do not care, what the public wants! But good luck to you, i hope your efforts are rewarding!
AAARRRGHH!!!
The stupid moderator talked too damn much, and they ran out of time before anyone else could address the last question about the Line Item Veto…
I thought for SURE that Bob Barr would come out with guns blazing on that one as a distortion of the Contitutional balance of power toward the Executive.
THE HOUSE CONTROLS THE PURSE STRINGS — PERIOD.